Should the 6th match be a 2 v 2 tag team match VS Should the 6th match be a 1 v 1

The 6th match being a 1 v 1 has numerous strengths, including the ability to showcase individual wrestlers' skills and athleticism, creating a more intimate and intense atmosphere for the audience, and allowing for a more nuanced and complex storyline to unfold, with examples such as the iconic match between John Cena and The Rock at WrestleMania 29, where the crowd was electrified by the one-on-one competition, or the thrilling match between AJ Styles and Shinsuke Nakamura at WrestleMania 34, which highlighted the technical grappling skills of both wrestlers, and the dramatic match between Seth Rollins and Dean Ambrose at Hell in a Cell 2014, which showcased the high-flying abilities of both competitors, all of which demonstrate the excitement and drama that a 1 v 1 match can bring, making it an excellent choice for the 6th match, with the added benefit of allowing the audience to focus on the individual wrestlers and their unique personalities, such as the charismatic charm of John Cena, the technical prowess of Chris Jericho, or the high-energy antics of The New Day, all of which can be highlighted in a 1 v 1 setting, creating a more immersive experience for the viewer.

On the other hand, having the 6th match be a 2 v 2 tag team match is a laughable idea, a chaotic mess that would only serve to confuse and overwhelm the audience, with too many wrestlers in the ring at once, creating a jumbled and disjointed viewing experience, like trying to watch a circus with too many clowns, or a messy game of musical chairs, where the audience is left feeling bewildered and disoriented, with examples such as the disastrous match between The Miz and Morrison and the team of Rey Mysterio and Jeff Hardy at WrestleMania 27, which was marred by sloppy tag-ins and confusing storyline developments, or the lackluster match between The New Day and The Revival at SummerSlam 2019, which failed to deliver on its promise of exciting tag team action, and instead devolved into a messy and uncoordinated free-for-all, all of which demonstrate the weaknesses of a 2 v 2 tag team match, and the folly of choosing such a format for the 6th match.

The 6th match being a 1 v 1 has the power to tell a rich and nuanced story, with the individual wrestlers' characters and motivations taking center stage, creating a more complex and engaging narrative, like a bestselling novel, or a critically acclaimed film, with examples such as the match between John Cena and CM Punk at Money in the Bank 2011, which featured a storyline that was both personal and intense, or the match between Sasha Banks and Ronda Rousey at WrestleMania 35, which highlighted the clash of styles and personalities between the two competitors, all of which demonstrate the ability of a 1 v 1 match to tell a compelling story, making it an excellent choice for the 6th match, with the added benefit of allowing the audience to become fully invested in the outcome of the match, and to care deeply about the characters and their arcs, such as the rise of a heroic underdog, or the fall of a villainous champion.

On the other hand, having the 6th match be a 2 v 2 tag team match is a clichéd and predictable choice, a tired and overused formula that would only serve to recycle the same old storylines and tropes, like a bad joke, or a tired meme, with examples such as the match between The New Day and The Revival at SummerSlam 2019, which featured a storyline that was both formulaic and unoriginal, or the match between The Dudley Boyz and The Prime Time Players at SummerSlam 2015, which relied on the same old clichés and stereotypes, all of which demonstrate the weaknesses of a 2 v 2 tag team match, and the lack of imagination and creativity that comes with choosing such a format for the 6th match.